The ArmadilloCon Writers' Workshop was excellent again this year. The morning was devoted to a wide-ranging discussion about different aspects of writing and publishing. Pros who write, edit, publish and review all had great advice and opinions about the process of writing and the business of getting published.
After lunch we broke into separate critique groups. The ratio of pros to students was nearly 1:1. My group had four students and three pros! (Cat Rambo, Liz Gorinsky from Tor, and Stina Leicht) Everyone, student and pro alike, put their egos aside and came to work. I feel like everyone gave and got good feedback for the chapters and stories they brought. I'll be revising my short story next week and look forward to sending it out into the world.
I have always felt that both getting AND giving critiques are valuable tools when learning how to write. There are so many techniques that you must manage to produce really good prose. When I write I try to get inside the story, the characters, and their world. It's easy to loose perspective about what's working and what isn't. Putting the work away for a few days can help (and I do that too). But getting a critical perspective on a work in progress is often what will help me take it to the next level.
The key is a CRITICAL perspective. It sounds scary, and the endeavor is not without pitfalls. There isn't really any instruction for critiquing, so most of us just have to learn how to do it any way we can. The world of critiquing is full of trolls and ogres who will tear your work down so they can show how brilliant they are (NOT). There are well-meaning dolts, toadies and yes men (usually relatives) only interested in heaping praise on anything you show them.
Learning how to give good criticism will help you recognize and find good critiquers for your own work. I started out reading slush for the Austin Film Festival's annual screenwriting competition. I would recommend looking for slush work. It's an eye-opening introduction to the basics of presentation and storytelling, and you don't need that much experience to weed out the awful.
Most of the time the only option is to dive in. Take a workshop if you can, or look for a group in your area. Many people form their own groups after attending a workshop like the
ArmadilloCon Writer's Workshop. With Skype and other chat services it's
possible to have a real-time discussion regardless of where you all live.
Here in Austin, Texas I attend the Slugtribe writer's group, which is an open critique group. I like meeting face-to-face because it allows for a give and take that can be useful and illuminating. People in the group can ask you questions and tailor their comments to your stated intention. Also, people can disagree, which often generates a discussion about the piece that goes in interesting places.
When you're live and/or in-person the Milford rules are a good format, which is essentially keep your trap shut - and listen, really listen - while everyone gives their thoughts and impressions on your work. Don't worry you'll get your turn at the end. But remember a critique is not about you defending your work against all comers, it's about problem solving and making what you've done better.
You may find that learning how to articulate how a story isn't working, will teach you as much about writing techniques as any book or class. Good criticism requires you to fully engage with the work of others; to think not about how YOU would write this story or chapter but about what this writer is trying to accomplish.
The more you learn how to give it the easier it is to take it. Getting good criticism helps you to develop a thick skin, because you can't write good
stories without becoming emotionally involved, and even if you know they
aren't perfect, it still hurts to have their imperfections pointed out.
Also, it will teach you to be brave. By accepting errors (in a story in particular or your work in general), you reduce their cost. Once you see that the flaws pointed out by a good critique session can be addressed, you can spend less time perfecting your work before anybody sees it and more time being daring and trying new techniques.
There are also some online groups out there for genre writers. Most of them require you to critique other members' work in order to put yours up for critique, providing both an opportunity to give and receive critiques. The downsides of these groups are the same as with any web-based endeavor of this sort: from amateur or lazy critiques to snark and worse. I still think it's better than nothing, just gird yourself for the experience. Critters is an open and free group. It's quite high volume and can be a good place to start. Currently, I use the Online Writing Workshop they charge a small annual fee. I feel that this investment shows in both higher quality work and better critiques.
Just remember to critique in the spirit of generosity. No matter
how bad someone's work is, they were still brave enough to put it out
there, so find a way to be both kind and honest. Just remember, it's about the work and, I believe, about supporting each other on the journey.
Showing posts with label writer's workshops. Show all posts
Showing posts with label writer's workshops. Show all posts
Thursday, August 2, 2012
Thursday, July 26, 2012
ArmadilloCon34 Writers' Workshop Tomorrow!
Tomorrow is the ArmadilloCon Writers' Workshop. I am really excited to participate again this year. This convention knows how to do workshops right! It's all morning and afternoon tomorrow BEFORE the convention actually starts, so I don't have to miss any panels to participate. I've been working all week on my critiques for my fellow workshoppers, who I'll meet tomorrow. It's a little nerve wracking to write critiques for people I've never met but it's a good practice. It's also refreshing to critique work from writers I don't know.
I attended ArmadilloCon and the Writers' Workshop for the first time last year and had a great and productive weekend. My pros last year were none other than Paolo Bacigalupi, Lou Anders and Mark Finn. They all provided great advice and insight. This year I'll be sitting down with Liz Gorinsky (an editor at Tor), Stina Leicht and Cat Rambo!
Okay that page is a revision not a crit, but it was just too cool to ignore! I've been putting together some thoughts about why I think workshops and critiquing are valuable and will be posting that soon.
Meanwhile, I've been re-reading Bradbury's collection of essays and remembering that while I'm working very hard to hone my craft, writing should always be fun, more than fun, thrilling. His enthusiasm is truly inspirational.

This morning I watched the long and gorgeous trailer for the upcoming film adaptation of David Mitchell's Cloud Atlas. I don't know if they'll pull it off, but that was a beautiful six minutes. It made me want to read that book all over again.
I attended ArmadilloCon and the Writers' Workshop for the first time last year and had a great and productive weekend. My pros last year were none other than Paolo Bacigalupi, Lou Anders and Mark Finn. They all provided great advice and insight. This year I'll be sitting down with Liz Gorinsky (an editor at Tor), Stina Leicht and Cat Rambo!
![]() | ||
| Manuscript page from J. G. Ballard's Crash |
This morning I watched the long and gorgeous trailer for the upcoming film adaptation of David Mitchell's Cloud Atlas. I don't know if they'll pull it off, but that was a beautiful six minutes. It made me want to read that book all over again.
Thursday, June 28, 2012
ApolloCon 2012 report
![]() |
| I enjoyed ArmadilloCon so much last year, I thought I'd try out Houston's version. |
Friday
Of Blood Spatters and Fingerprints: Clues to Fool the Savviest Fan
Martha Wells, Patrice Sarath, Bill Crider, and Ramirez
A discussion of how mystery writers work clues into their stories without telegraphing the ending. It's tricky walking the fine line between believability and predictability to create a satisfying mystry. All writers being different, many approaches were discussed.
Cue the Evil Laugh: Lessons Learned from Evil Geniuses
Tanya Huff, Rosemary Clement-Moore, Rhonda Eudaly, and A. Lee Martinez
All about evil villain stereotypes and how smarter villains make for a better story. This was a lively panel where villains and villainy were discussed. Personages mentioned ranged from Thantos to Wile E. Coyote. Everyone agreed that good heroes need strong villains, and villains need to be relatable (you have to understand their motivations). Martinez has the theory that villains are often likeable because of their committment to their goal and their crazy ways, like how the riddler MUST frame everything in a riddle even when it makes things more difficult for him. Interesting. Glad I stayed up for this one!
Writers' Workshop
I spent the morning in the Writers' Workshop led by Martha Wells. It was a good solid critique session with three other participants in our group. We had time, after talking about our stories and chapters, to talk about some of the larger issues regarding world building and publishing. Very worth my time and you can't beat the price!
I spent the afternoon on the science panels. Being in Houston, a couple NASA people were kind enough to grace ApolloCon with their expertise.
Saturday Science with Paul Abell
Dr. Abell is the lead scientist for Planetary Small Bodies assigned to the Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science Directorate at the NASA Johnson Space Center. Wow! What a title. He gave a really interesting talk about the study of NEO (i.e. asteroids), and he brought slides!
100 Year Starship
Al Jackson, Stanley Love, Paul Abell, and Todd Caldwell
![]() | |||||
| He was dressed slightly more casually for the con. |
Enter the Dragon: SpaceX and the Future of Manned Spaceflight
Al Jackson, Paul Abell, Stanley Love, and Scott Padget
A discussion about how private space companies will shape the future of crewed spaceflight and space exploration. This was a lively panel with some real world information and anecdotes from the people who make it all happen.
I finished off the afternoon with Austin (both Jane and Texas!) author Patrice Sarath. She read an excerpt from The Crow God's Girl, her stand alone novel of the Godarth Wood Series. The excerpt sounded quite intriguing, so I have yet another book to load onto my Kindle.![]() |
| I made sure to stop by ArmadilloCon's Party since I'll be seeing them next month! |
Sunday
Writing 101
Tanya Huff, Kerry Tolan, Bev Hale, and Julia Mandala
Billed as tips from pros on how to get started, stay motivated, and how to see your Big Idea through to the end. The wide-open topic seemed well suited to the first panel of the morning. It was fun with lots of real world writing advice and encouragement.
The Best YA You and Your Teen are not Reading
Patrice Sarath, Bev Hale, and Katy Pace
Well attended and in a small room, which happily encouraged more of a group discussion. Very enjoyable and now I have another long list of books to read - I may have to delegate some of these titles to my daughter!
Authors and books mentioned included (but were by no means limited to):
The Iron Fey series by Julie Kagawa
Divergent and Insurgent by Veronica Roth
Scott Westerfield (Uglies, Leviathan)
The Girl of Fire and Thorns by Rae Carson
M. T. Anderson and Paolo Bacigalupi
Thursday, May 31, 2012
Countdown to ApolloCon 2012
![]() |
| The show that spawned a million conventions. |
- You can't beat the price, compared to most writer's workshops, these workshops are generally well under $100, and that's with 3-day convention badge included.
- Getting feedback from pros and other writers who are unfamiliar with my themes and quirks (as opposed to feedback from my regular critique group, which is also good but in different ways).
- Geeking out at the hotel bar with other writers and scifi/fantasy genre types.
![]() |
| Han Solo says, "Enough talk, get back to writing." |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










