Today you can read my story, "Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast," at the Saturday Night Reader's lovely website. It's flash fiction, so it will only take you a minute. Stick around to read some of their many other short stories. There's a lot of diversity in style and content in these pages, so there is something for everyone.
I can't really say how I came up with a time travel story influenced by Alice in Wonderland, but this one sure was fun to write!
Illustration for Alice in Wonderland by Arthur Reckham
Summer is winding down and my work on the novel is ramping up. Not much to blog about this week. Instead you can click on over to the Review Review to read my review of december magazine. Another strong literary journal that covers a broad range of poetry, essay and fiction.
Czech designer, Kateřina
Smolíková, captures the wonder of bioluminescent sealife in her breathtaking glass
chandelier design -- to me, this looks like a wonderful design for a living spaceship!
The story I wrote for SFComet, The Nephelai's Song, is now available to read in English.
SFComet is definitely worth keeping an eye on. Every month five writers are given a prompt and must write a short story in ten days. My prompt was "echo from the future," and The Nephelai's Song is what I came up with. To date, all the stories are no longer than 2,500 words, but according to their home page they are upping the word count, so some longer stories will be on the way! Check out their archives for more great science fiction stories!
First things first, one of my favorite flash fiction stories
is currently up at the wonderful Flash Fiction Online. Even if you’ve already
read it, be sure to stop by and check out all the other fabulous stories
featured at this excellent venue!
I’ve spent this week resting up and catching up after a
wonderful Armadillocon 37. This is a small literary con, which makes it extra
friendly as you keep seeing the same faces at panels, readings, in the audiences,
and passing each other in the hallways. The guests, James Morrow and Ken Liu,
were super friendly and fun to talk with, which really set the tone for the
weekend. The programming was excellent this year, and I had to make a lot of
tough choices. Here’s what my con looked like.
THE WRITERS’ WORKSHOP
The Writers’ Workshop went well. We spent the morning in two
in-depth panels (the topic varies every year).First we discussed how to structure your work. Questions and comments
covered works of all different lengths and types. Later we talked about how to
go about assessing what you’re working on, with larger thoughts about managing
projects and the writing life. Between these two panels, the workshop attendees
broke out into small groups for a quick and quite entertaining writing
exercise.
We broke out into our assigned critique groups for lunch, so
that we could get to know each other a little better before diving into the
critiques. Martha Wells and I had five bright new writers, all with interesting
stories or first chapters. Even the newbies did well, both giving and taking
critique like pros! Covering five manuscripts in three hours is a tad
exhausting, but so rewarding.
Another big benefit for workshop participants is that they
get so spend early Friday forming connections with their fellow workshop attendees,
so they already have a couple dozen familiar faces going into the rest of the
weekend.
I think the concom’s commitment to this workshop, which
feels like an integral part of Armadillocon (and not just a tacked on event as
it can at other cons), is one of the reasons that Armadillocon continues to
have a well-deserved reputation as an excellent literary/writerly con.
THE PANELS
The hard part about being on programming is that I now have
commitments, and can’t get around to see all the panels that are scheduled at
the same time as the ones that I’m on!
I was a little nervous about my first panel, “The Work of
James Morrow.” While I have loved everything of his that I’ve read, I have only
read a fraction of his books! Luckily, I was in the company of some great minds
such as Jacob Weisman, Chris Brown, and Claude Lalumiere. As with all good
panels, it became a conversation that covered Morrow’s works and their
universal themes of human nature, theology and philosophy. James
Morrow and his wife attended the panel, and were darlings, heartily rooting our
conversation on! It was a delightful hour and such a pleasure to meet the man
whose works I’m so enjoying!
I attended the “Silkpunk: Asian themes and influences in
SF/F” panel. Ken Liu, Jake Kerr, Wesley Chu, and Justin Landon among others discussed the use of Asian themes, and the nature of
cultural difference between east and west as we might see it through genre
literature. The take away was that we are all more alike then we might assume,
though there are some interesting differences between story forms and the
expression of common themes via fable and various mythologies.
Ken Liu also gave a fascinating talk about the nature of
translating literature titled “Betrayal With Integrity:
Conformance and Estrangement in Translating Chinese SF.” As the title suggests
it was full of thinky thinks. As someone only tangentially interested in the
nuts and bolts of translation, I was completely fascinated and gained insights
that will forever change how I view translated texts.
Then it was on to an excellent panel on the hot button topic,
“The Hugo Award’s Struggle for Relevance” expertly moderated by Michelle Muenzler,
with Lou Antonelli, Justin Landon, Marguerite Reed and Jacob Weisman. This curated discussion about the
Hugos, slate voting, and the Sad Puppies. The discussion was both passionate
and illuminating.
Then I was up for “SF as a Survival Guide.” (Personally, it
was more about me surviving in a conscious state for a 10:00 p.m. panel!) We
discussed a variety of different apocalypses featured in popular media,
including Zombies, nuclear war, and natural disasters. We also covered Kaiju (e.g. Godzilla); stay out of urban centers was
the take-away there. Long-term survival would look pretty pastoral, and we
agreed that this might be part of the appeal of these kinds of stories – a chance
to hit the reset button.
My last panel of the con was “Short Fiction You Should Have
Read Last Year” with K. B. Rylander, Eugene Fischer and myself. After discussing our
favorite stories, and stories that made a splash this year, we talked about
great venues to find, read, and listen to great short fiction. I will post a
list as soon as I locate my scrawled notes from Sunday morning.
MISCELLANY
I heard Patrick Sullivan read a fantasy story of magic, love
and zoomorphic calligraphy. I also listened to a suspenseful excerpt from
Patrice Sarath Bandit Girls novel.
Jacob Weisman, founder of Tachyon Press was back with his
usual selection of great books. When not at panels or readings, I spent some
time chatting with him in the buyers’ room. He's another very approachable pro
with lots of good insight into the business. I love that Tachyon publishes
short stand-alone novels (call them long novellas if you prefer), as that’s my
favorite reading niche. I picked up Shambling Toward Hiroshima by James Morrow,
and We Are All Completely Fine by Daryl Gregory. In the buyers room, I also
finally got my hands on a copy of Lagoon by Nnedi Okorafor, a book I’ve been
waiting to read for a while now. Hopefully, one day I’ll see her on
ArmadilloCon’s guest roster!
I'm looking forward to a fun weekend. Look at all these amazing panelists and cool topics. I'm going to have to bring my A game! The Armadillocon Writers' Workshop Friday 9:00-4:00 p.m. The Work of James Morrow Friday 9:00-10:00 p.m., Ballroom D Christopher Brown, Claude Lalumiere*, N. J. Moore, Rebecca Schwarz, Jacob Weisman Our panelists explore the humor, breadth, and impact of our
Special Guest's writings. How Would Discovery of Alien Life
Affect Us?
Saturday 10:00-11:00 p.m., Ballroom D P. J. Hoover, Juan Manuel Perez*, Lawrence Person, Rebecca Schwarz, Lee Thomas OK, you've read about dozens of apocalypses. How are you
going to use that to survive? Short Fiction You Should Have Read Last
Year
A week from today,
writers from far and wide will be gathering in Austin for The Armadillocon Writers’ Workshop. I’m excited to take my place among the pros this year. This
is my hometown con. I have been a student of this workshop for several years
and have learned a lot about the craft and art of writing from the wide range
of professional writers that make this workshop so special.
I know workshops
can be a daunting proposition. Since I started writing seriously, I’ve gone
beyond the Writers’ Workshop. I attend my local in-person critique group and participate
in online critique communities. These activities have both improved my writing,
and thickened my skin a bit when it comes to presenting a brand new piece of
writing to a group of people who I’ve implicitly and explicitly tasked with
finding its faults.
It’s hard, after
investing so much in a story, to hear about all the ways its not working yet.
It’s like finding out my beautiful baby is a Frankenstein’s monster after all. (But
fear not, after some excisions, new body parts, and some clever suturing, my
readers might just see a thing of beauty after all. And with luck, they’ll love
it as much as I did when I struggled to create it.)
Workshopping is
not for everyone, but you’ll never know if a workshop or critique group is
valuable to your process until you try it, so here are some thoughts to get you
through the experience. Many workshops
(including Armadillocon) use the Milford method of critique, or at least the
essence of it, which is: “The author whose work is
being critiqued has to sit in silence through the first part in which each
participant in turn is allowed an uninterrupted four minutes to deliver their
critique. Then the author gets an uninterrupted right to reply. Following that
a general discussion ensues.”
I believe that
the single most important reason that this method works so well is that it
forces you to:
No speaking up
while receiving your critique. This is more than just good manners, it is a
crucial skill that every writer should hone. You may feel like you, or your
work, is on trial. You are not. It is not. When people are engaged in a debate
or a conversation they tend to spend the time when the other person is talking
formulating a response. When you are thinking about what you are going to say,
you are not listening. Regardless of the stated rules of any particular
workshop or critique group, practice not only shutting your mouth, which will
give you the appearance of polite propriety, but also opening your mind so you
can really hear. This is hard, I think because it is hard for us to truly
receive anything, say nothing of critical notes on a piece of our own writing.
Your group is a
collection of writers trying to improve their craft, but it’s important to
remember that you are all readers, too. Listen for the ways these readers go
astray, look for patterns. Is everyone getting hung up on a certain detail,
wondering what a character looked like, or how the knight’s horse got from the
stable to the field? More than once I’ve been rewarded for really listening.
Even the person who is entirely off base regarding what I am trying to accomplish
with a particular story, will often have valuable insights embedded in their
feedback, little gems that I would have missed if I wasn’t giving that person
my full attention.
You will hear multiple
opinions on your story. This is a great opportunity to compare your intention,
your vision, to what others are actually receiving when they read it. Until
telepathy becomes a reality, what you are trying to communicate with a story,
and what your reader gets will never be the same thing.
Be kind to
yourself. In the heat of creation I’m investing myself in the story, sometimes
the drafts come easy, sometimes they come hard. Either way, I’m often riding
high when I finish. Sometimes, I’m even convinced that this piece is pretty
damn good; sometimes it is, sometimes not so much. It can be hard to tell when
I’m still so close to it.
More than once
I’ve gone in to my crit group thinking I’ll just get their stamp of approval,
they’ll catch a couple typos, and I’ll be sending it to editors tomorrow. It
hurts to find out that my story isn’t quite working yet, that there are confusions
and problems that still need to be solved. That it will take more time and hard
work before this story will become all that it can be.
If you are pushing
yourself you will have some brilliant successes, but more often you will fall
down, will write something that has moments of brilliance but is also deeply
flawed – this is a good thing. Achieving excellence is a long hard road, but
that’s the road you’re on, right? Be kind to yourself. Catch your breath. Set
your story aside for a few days. When you pick it up again, read all the
positive comments first; fluff up your ego a bit before taking the next step.
With most
groups, you will be sent home with half a dozen copies of your manuscript
riddled with notes, some of which will agree, others will directly contradict
each other. This is the tricky part. You want to keep your ego somewhat intact,
but there’s no point in workshopping a story if you’re not going to consider any of the advice. At the same time, it
is important not to rank everyone else’s opinion over your own. As a writer,
one of your greatest assets is your voice, and I think the quickest ways to
destroy your unique voice is to try to implement every note given. You have to assess
all these notes and opinions and decide what to take.
Before going
through the notes, I believe the best thing you can do is sit down and really
think about what you’re trying to accomplish with this particular story. What
is your goal with this piece? If the first draft is about figuring out how to write it, this draft is about the
Why. Why did you tell this particular
story in this particular mode? I will usually work this out in my journal. Once
I have the Why of the story, I can better see which comments to use and which
to disregard.
Reading other
people’s stories critically is one of the best exercises by which writers can learn
their craft. When critiquing, I read for comprehension, plot and flow, marking
the manuscript as I go. I note places where I’m confused, phrases that seem out
of the idiom for the setting or characters. I write questions that pop into my
head as I’m reading.
Afterwards, I
think about the story as a whole and make a guess at what the writer is trying
to accomplish with this particular piece. When I give feedback, I usually say,
this is what I think you’re trying to do here and these are the things that
worked/didn’t work – for me. Using phrases like “I think” and “for me” are not capitulations
or ways to soften the blows of a critique – it’s an acknowledgement that I am
one reader. The things that bother me may not bother the next person.
Be kind to
others. Receiving critical comments on something that I worked very hard on,
something that I may still have deep emotional ties to is hard. So when giving
feedback I want to be kind. It is not kind to refrain from pointing out the
weak spots in a manuscript because you don’t want to upset a fellow writer. On
the other hand it is not kind to shred someone else’s work in the name of
artistic perfection.
In a regular
critique group, you will get to know your fellow crit mates and may be able to
be more frank in your feedback. But often you may find yourself in a group – like
The Armadillocon Writers’ Workshop – where you are meeting your workshop mates
in person for the first time at the critique session. In either situation is
always a good practice to find the positives of any given piece. I like to lead
off with a couple specific examples of things I enjoyed. In the middle I’ll
bring up the elements that were problematic, confusions, and anything that
pulled me out of the story. After talking about the weaknesses, I like to
finish on a high note with my impression of what the strengths are for the
piece in particular or aspects of the writing that are working well in general.
And with those
thoughts, I wish you happy writing, happy workshopping, and happy revising!
My Story The Nephelai's Song is up at SF Comet, but here's the catch. It is currently exclusively in Chinese! Every month SF Comet invites five authors to write a story to a specific theme. They are then posted and readers vote to pick their favorite. I was invited to write a story for June. The theme was "Echo from the Future."
You can see the story in Chinese here. But don't worry, if you don't happen to read Chinese the story will be posted on their English language web page later this summer.
I've also opined about a couple of
excellent summer short reads over at SF Signal's Mind Meld. I picked Sleep Donation by Karen Russell and The Lathe of Heaven by Ursula K. Le Guin. I am among several great writers, each of whom suggest short stand-alone
novels. I'll definitely be adding some of these books to my beach bag.
